>>710
>>711
OK, I just tested it in Ubuntu under chrome and it works. For some reason though I can not screenshot it because when I go to screen shot in Ubuntu it turns the cursor temporarily back into an arrow so it doesn't look like it worked. Did you compile from source or did you get chrome-browser through aptitude?

Just fixed it so this doesn't show up in a text style board...why do we even have daily life anymore? No one ever goes there...

>>714
I go there all the time. I just don't post because I'm not even sure what should go there.

after looking at it I think you may get the same answer as in >>626
I wouldn't be surprised if it was the same issue/picture. If I have the picture though I may be able to finally resolve it.

>>684
Different image, that one was 2.5mb. Here is a link to the image
http://img715.imageshack.us/img715/7916/1267768014800.jpg

Just FYI, the resolution is 3000 x 1944

OK, I have located the problem and it does have something to do with the dimension. The code that was written uses a php function called imagecreatetruecolor. This function uses the maximum of memory allowed in our php.ini file. I could up it if I so desired but I am not really a fan of upping the memory usage and having our server hog up resources only to allow images to post. The memory is set to 32MB right now and I assume that would be enough for most images. I will look a little for, and if you find any, more efficient similart functions in PHP I would be willing to try them out and see if it fixes some of the problems but really it is sort of sounding like a limitation with the language/alloted memory usage.

Resources:
http://php.net/manual/en/function.imagecreatetruecolor.php
http://www.graphic-forums.com/archive/index.php/t-2589.html
>I had a similar problem myself. THe issue here is the function imagecreatetruecolor(); it uses alot of memory, and is not all that efficient. when editing a large image, the memory it uses is several orders of magnitude larger than the image itself for some reason.

>>637
e-mail'd

Woohoo! It's working. Now I just need to figure out how to capture video in an encoded fashion. DivX or XviD or even MPEG2 for all I care.

...or just implement a fucking huge hard drive.

Yes. TV tuner cards come with drivers & software. Most will have video capture software. Check your driver cd, or find all that's available for your card online. Let google be thy friend.

(USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST)

Here's a link to the location:
http://maps.google.com/maps?q=rolla,+mo&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-a&ie=UTF8&hq=&hnear=Rolla,+Phelps,+Missouri&gl=us&ei=yH-WS62UMIzWNfKt6UY&ved=0CAsQ8gEwAA&ll=37.966768,-91.77309&spn=0.014379,0.042014&z=
15&layer=c&cbll=37.966778,-91.773284&panoid=Hfc6KUzjDxI8tonECYVCwA&cbp=12,249.08,,0,0.4

>>669
Link fail. I fix it.
http://5z8.info/rickroll_x1i9g_b00bs

So you want a free solutions manual, and are willing to go as far as campus? What a deal for the person giving away the manual!

Also, this isn't seek42, get off mah /b/

and.. something about putting in your e-mail address.. I don't know.

>>659
This is /r/. Also, email is for communication purposes.

I see your argument, and reject it completely.

me and some people have an oncampus only dc++ hub. I think its on there. http://www.risentech.net/strongclient.zip email me if you have any issues

>>648
I'll trade you for just some regular waffles. And maple syrup. None of that Corn-syrup synthetic shit, the REAL blood of the maple.

>>628
The image was a 2.5mb one, so it is valid on /w/. Its resolution is 3692x2414, which I guess is too much.

>>630
lol Oh wow. What's the progress of fixing this, admin?

>>632
jack shit, we have lives too.

>>614
Pick it up here: http://maps.google.com/maps?q=37.960652,-91.753172

You seem to repeat yourself a lot, are you sure you are not a bot?

here you go

>>610
I am 100% real person and not a bot. I copy and pasted what I asked to other sites.

>>611
Funny but not what I was looking for.